Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Ind. to join lawsuit against federal health bill

Published: Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 01:03

Indiana followed 13 other states Monday in planning to file a lawsuit against the recently passed health care bill.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller said an amended lawsuit will be filed soon in a federal court in Florida, according to the Associated Press. The lawsuit will have a cost of $50,000 and will be divided among the 14 states.

Sen. Richard Lugar requested a report from Zoeller on Jan. 5, seeking a review on the bill that had been passed by the U.S. Senate on Dec. 24.

In his report, Zoeller listed conflicts he found with the health care law, such as the requirement for U.S. residents to purchase a health care plan and fully funding the expansion of Medicaid only in Nebraska.

Gov. Mitch Daniels also stated conflicts with the health care law, saying it would raise taxes drastically on investment and small business and would harm economic prospects badly.

The expansion of Medicaid also will affect taxpayers, Daniels said, and companies that cannot afford to cover their employees will cut jobs.

David Orentlicher, professor at the Indiana University School of Law in Indianapolis, said the states' move is one motivated by politics and not by constitutional issues.

"I agree that there are things that are things that should be revised, but I think filing a lawsuit will not be effective," he said. "I think the unfortunate part is that they will spend tax dollars for their political cause."

Orentlicher said he disagreed with most of what Daniels said last week about the health care law. He said there were conflicts with the state's move, arguing there is "nothing unconstitutional with the health care law."

"They also say they will opt out. You can't do that once the Senate passes the bill and it's turned into a law. Every state has to follow," he said.

Sheila Kennedy, professor of law and public policy at IUPUI, said she did not support the planned lawsuit from the state either. She said spending more from Indiana's scarce sources was not a good move.

But states have confronted laws, declaring them unconstitutional before, Kennedy said. The case is similar to the implementation of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal.

"It's going to take a generation, just as when they passed Medicare," he said. "This is a huge step forward."

Kennedy said she did not agree with Daniel's arguments on the issues brought with the health care law.

"He comes from the health care sector. He is one of the people that has never seen any tax being levied," she said. "What this bill does is provide assistance for small employers."

Changes in the health care law will be a gradual process, Orentlicher said. The benefits will be "more than issues with the law," he said.

"Indiana will have to pay some more, but to get a return that is more than what we give, it's a good deal," he said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Joyce A. Marlow, Indpls, IN
Wed Apr 28 2010 12:51
Government mandated Health Care? Has anyone here ever read anything that was written before 1950?, before 1900? How about the Declaration of Independence or The Constitution of the United States of America, The Bill of Rights or Common Sense by Thomas Paine? The dumbing down of America started in the 50's. We've come a long way down since then. Most of you have no idea what's been lost. May you live to see the day that you do. America....may she rest in peace.
David Bowden
Thu Apr 1 2010 12:06
All of the liberal students at Ball State aren't going to support this bill so muich when they figure out they're going to HAVE to carry a health insurance plan if they don't have one. My girlfriend pays 1,600 a year for basic coverage. More money out of our pockets, as always. And will someone remind me why Canadians come here for healthcare and we don't go to Canada for healthcare? And now we want to be like Canada? Is that really moving forward?
backhome
Thu Apr 1 2010 01:04
A dozen other states filed suit against the federal government to block the healthcare bill well ahead of Indiana. If they win, the health care bill will be repealed or modified in EVERY state - including Indiana. The presence of our state in the lawsuit itself will not affect the outcome one way or the other. Filing the suit is a waste of our taxpayer money designed to mollify those who oppose the bill on ANY grounds. Shame on the governor, shame on the attorney general.

Waste of time, waste of money. The bill was passed by both houses of the elected congress, reconciled and signed by the elected president. More Indiana residents voted for the president in the past election than voted for McCain. The president ran on a platform of providing health care for all Americans. The bill isn't perfect but it is better than no bill at all. The election was over a long time ago. Health care for most Americans is now the law of the land.

MomandPie
Tue Mar 30 2010 18:56
::-p Does anyone teach history in this country?
"Forward" too what exactly?
Why is "active" politics always given the face of "good" politics?
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 16:36
I'll admit, I am not politically savvy whatsoever and a lot of things political go over my head, but I agree that filing a lawsuit would cost us Indiana residents more than it's worth, or at least more than we should spend just to make a statement. Change is always scary, but being too resistant and throwing a lawsuit at the federal government just hurts us more.






log out