The Ball State Daily News

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Cultures catching up show more progress than those already ahead

By Javonte Anderson

Published: Monday, February 6, 2012

Updated: Tuesday, February 7, 2012

The history of the African American is a very delicate and controversial issue. The past injustices inflicted upon us have had a residual effect on our current disposition in America. I have chosen to analyze this sensitive issue by utilizing a universal academic discipline, economics.

There is an economic theory entitled the "catch up effect." This theory suggests that countries that start off poor tend to grow more rapidly than countries that start off rich.

The catch-up effect is applicable in other aspects of life. Let's look at a traditional high school end-of-year awards ceremony. One student is awarded "most improved." This student has shown the most academic progress throughout the school year. However, for a student to exhibit such exponential growth, he or she must have begun the year performing relatively poor.

The student with the best academic performance, typically near perfection, is awarded "valedictorian." He or she executed superb academic performance consistently throughout the entire school year. Unfortunately, the valedictorian consistency impedes on his or her growth. It is good to be "most improved," but Valedictorian trumps that achievement any day.

In reference to the African American race, we are the "most improved" student. The white American race is the valedictorian. We have irrefutably made the most progress, compared to any other race, throughout the past century. However, we can only be awarded "most improved" due to the state of destitution we were originally in. Historical occurrences have indisputably hindered and temporarily ceased our educational, financial, and societal growth as a whole.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, the African American high school dropout rate has decreased from 19.1 percent in 1980, to 8.4 percent in 2007. In comparison to white Americans, whose high school dropout rate has decreased from 11.4 percent in 1980, to 5.3 percent in 2007. Yes, African Americans have had more growth in this discrete educational category. But white Americans still have a lower dropout rate.

Let's look at one more example. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of African Americans who were below the poverty level decreased from 32.5 percent in 1980, to 25.8 percent in 2009. Contrastingly, the percentage of white Americans who were below the poverty level increased from 10.2 percent in 1980, to 12.3percent in 2009. Once again African Americans have had more growth in regards to poverty, while white Americans poverty level have actually increased. Nevertheless, African Americans poverty level (as of 2009) is still 13.5 percent higher.

I juxtapose a universal economic theory with the African American race for one reason. Yes, I am extremely gratified with the growth and progress of the African American race. However, I strive to emphasize one point. Growth does not equate to equality.

jaanderson@bsu.edu

Comments

14 comments
Tweety
Thu Feb 9 2012 11:00
Revolution doesn't install the same power system with a new group of faces, it changes the dynamics of Power Relations. (note: the word Revolution doesn't require strife between humans)

In your chase for growth, if your highest mark is a power structure which you believe wrongly holds you to less than you could be, then You are chasing a system of repression. You are, then, not after equality at all; instead chasing coup d'etat in hopes of replacing one thug with your own.

Now, to be careful, I am NOT saying that the current system does indeed make effort to hold you to less.

I am recognizing that IF this is -Your Statement-, and you want equal authority within THAT system, you aren't aiming for true Equality, you are aiming for your own lusts.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 9 2012 08:44
I hear that in N. Korea, everyone is truly treated equal. Try living there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tweety
Wed Feb 8 2012 23:54
"XYZ are constantly put in the inferior status. "
I think you have to be very careful with this thought, as human psyche generally seems to tend toward finding itself superior to other humans, for any number of reasons. Including, perhaps, a view of "more egalitarian than..."

If you are attentive to a certain group of people's acting in their natural state, without recognizing the universality of the behavior, you might wrongly identify this behavior as either stronger in that group, and/or more pointedly aimed at yourself than what is consciously or subconsciously intended.

Certainly, I think it becomes questionable, and very dangerous for the speakers, when people say things like, "it's a XYZ thing, so you can't understand." Really? Did human fear of isolation, or discomforting experience of weakness, become a factor only in relation to your situation? By such categorical separation, who are you serving, and what is the likely outcome? Again, what are you eating?

Tweety
Wed Feb 8 2012 23:26
The false victim card is generally shameful no matter who plays it, and very likely counterproductive, as it encourages leeching behavior and idleness as opposed to self dependance and real education which might serve one without the hand offering the handout. If you are threatened by someone using this tactic, you might find yourself relieved that the odds are good this person will not survive very long, so long as he prefers to depend on others for his own care, and so walk away with your head held high (so long as you are not doing the same).

However, as someone pointed out over in that tuition editorial, people learn to survive in their world. Playing victim can have short term survival benefits, even if they may be destructive in the long run. Certainly finding a social group with like experiences increases survivability, and it would be basic desire to have an identifier for that group. Additionally, it would be difficult to deny that much of US history saw legal subjugation by skin tone, hence there may be many common experiences around skin tone, leading to naming of....

Doesn't really help anyone to hoot and holler though. Intellectually honest people across the world have recognized that all persons have issues, and everyone knows a "that guy"...

ANTIMARKIST
Wed Feb 8 2012 19:14
I WOULD HAVE BEEN CONTENT TO SEE EVERY AMERICAN AS AN AMERICAN, BUT YOU PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT SELF IDENTIFY AS AFRICAN AMERICANS, MEANING, YOU ARE THE ONES THAT SEE THROUGH THE PRIZM OF RACE. - TO JOHN DOLT
John Doe
Wed Feb 8 2012 17:30
It is sad how anti-markist referred to African Americans as "you people." That was extremely insensitive. Purge the hatred out of your heart.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 8 2012 17:28
This article was written to bring awareness to the situation. Sadly enough there are people like anti-markist who gets upset at one article centered around African Americans. Great work Javonte! You have a ton of courage!
anti-markist
Wed Feb 8 2012 14:40
YOU PEOPLE PUT YOURSELVES IN THE INFERIOR STATUS EVERYDAY BY REMINDING THIS OF US. IF YOU WOULD WALK WITH HEADS UP HIGH, NOT PLAY THE BLAME GAME, TODAY'S CURRENT SOCIETY WOULD SEE YOU AS........WELL YOU, NOT A INFERIOR PERSON, WHICH IS BEING MADE INTO AN INFERIOR PERSON BY..........NOT SOCIETY....BUT THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous
Wed Feb 8 2012 14:27
I commend the author of this article!! We are equal only legally. It seems like no matter what we do, African Americans are constantly put in the inferior status. I'm not sure if this is something one could understand unless he/she was put in the same position, or has has experienced the same inequality.
anti-markist
Wed Feb 8 2012 12:28
a very delicate and controversial issue. The past injustices .....................NO THOSE ARE JUST BUZZ WORDS LIBS USE TO TRY TO SILENCE OPOSING VIEWS. FURTHERMORE, THOSE WHO FOCUS ON THE PAST WILL NEVER ACHIEVE GREATNESS IN THE FUTURE..........EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tweety
Wed Feb 8 2012 00:02
Very short term view, I think. Pecuniary status is much less relevant to long term survival than a million individual personal attitude choices, physical traits, and acted cultural expectations. Most of "I" is only very little of what "I" read in books, and much more what "I" saw in parents and what "I" made in habits (albeit plausibly altered by said learning, but not necessarily by and possibly opposite to "culturally standardized wealth"). I think that long term survival will show what "I" "do" for a "living" is much less important than "how" "I" do it.. As such, the short term "culturally inhibited" persons without the "proper" "what" may actually show rewards in survivability, immeasurable in a century span.

Said another way; If it is difficulty which exposes the appropriate functions in systems, it is ease which hides possible flaws.

Question: When did there become an African American race? Last I checked the race was human. I repeat for emphasis; You will always have inherent inequality while you look for divisible sets. "You are what you eat."

Gentleman
Tue Feb 7 2012 19:13
In response to Tweety:

Yes, book learning is education. Book education is the only way to attain a degree. Secondary education is required in the current American society. Formal education is the only way to permanently elevate the pecuniary status of the African American race.

Tweety
Tue Feb 7 2012 12:53
Couple points:
Presumption is that book learning is education. Is that a valid truth in all the implication in this great example of life? The Hebrews had a learning that they have still not forgotten almost 3kyears later, and which arguably shaped the jewish culture more than almost anything else on this planet.

Second, when does a chase for equality choose to forget skin color? You will always have an inherent inequality while you look for divisible sets.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 7 2012 11:11
Wow.....this article was very impressive. Kudos to the DN for running this story.
View full site